kiki-kit:

just thinkin on this purge and.. dammit this site can be hell but i dont wanna go, one of the main reasons i love tumblr so much is how much privacy it allows me like shit, i can choose when people can see if im online i can choose whether or not people see my likes, no one has to see exactly what blogs i follow, i fucking love that. twitters just too open for me and deviantarts just plain shit, not to mention the fact that interacting with people and finding what i like on here is SO EASY??? for someone who just wants to be able to hide in my own little corner of the internet unseen this place has really become a comfort

plaidos:

since the ban was announced, random sfw posts are being flagged all over the place; LGBT tags are being considered automatically adult content, sex workers and artists are losing their primary source of income, tumblr has confirmed CP erotica will remain on the website, the “#chronic pain” tag has been gutted for reasons beyond my comprehension and some of y’all are still really out here saying the ban is a net success for the website like… honestly, how can you side with them on this?

robotmango:

“why do we even need ao3/ why won’t they censor content i don’t like/ what’s that money going towards”

it’s going towards not arbitrarily deleting all your fucking blogs overnight because yahoo had a shareholders meeting, that’s what the fuck it’s going towards. if you don’t own it, they can yank the cord whenever they feel like it, for whatever reason, using whatever wobbly catch-all algorithm they want, and that is exactly what the fuck we’ve been telling you. “wellll i’m not a porn blog, it’s not going to affect me,” oh worm?? you sure?? this website is suddenly gonna be capable of censoring posted content with surgical precision? give ao3 ten bucks immediately and get real

Tumblr’s porn ban abandons the marginalised

kungfunurse:

camwyn:

Tumblr has a major porn problem – bots, spam and, most seriously, images of child abuse.

But for those that use its site legally, the decision to ban adult content across its entire network is seen as a reluctance to tackle the issues properly.

Tumblr
has decided to give up, rather than do as other sites have done and
invest in measures to handle illegal content, while allowing sexual
expression.

“There are no shortage of sites on the internet that
feature adult content,” said Jeff D’Onofrio, the site’s chief executive,
in explaining the decision.

He’s right, of course. There’s a lot of porn out there. But Tumblr has long offered something different, and important.  

Founded
11 years ago, Tumblr is a platform where users can publish text, images
and videos quickly, as well as share and comment on other submissions.
The site’s popularity peaked in 2014. Yet as its use dwindled, its
reputation as an alternative corner of the internet grew, not least as a
place to find unique adult material.  

Unlike typical pornography
sites, which overwhelmingly cater to men, and serve an often narrow
definition of what is attractive, Tumblr has been a home for something
else – content tailored at vibrant LGBT communities, or for those with
tastes you might not necessarily share with all your friends.

If
society deems it acceptable for any porn to be on the internet, then
that acceptance must surely be inclusive. Unlike most of those other
sites Mr D’Onofrio speaks of, Tumblr has been a space where different
body types are sexually celebrated, not degraded.  

‘I had feared this day would come’

In 2015, Cosmopolitan described Tumblr as a place where women “can explore their sexuality with the support of women without judgement or fear”.

It
argued that Tumblr’s design seemed to cater to different physical need:
offering a slow, building stream of visual and emotional content –
rather than the instant video gratification of sites designed with
hurried male audiences in mind, fast-forward button and all.

Many
on Tumblr have been fearing a porn ban since the network was acquired
by fading web giant Yahoo in 2013. That time, the adult content was
allowed to remain. But in 2017, when Yahoo was acquired by Oath, the
digital arm of telecoms giant Verizon, the writing was on the wall.

“I
had feared this day would come,” wrote one user, who runs a fetish
account, in response to the chief executive’s message on Monday.

“I’m
so sad to see this happen, and can’t believe I’ll be losing this blog. I
honestly don’t know what I’ll do without it, but I truly hope that the
kinky community comes up with a new place for us all to get together and
share.”

When the new guidelines come into effect they will
prohibit any depiction of human genitalia, “female-presenting nipples”
or sex acts – including illustrations. There will be exceptions for
classical artistic works and political protests that involve nudity, but
the company warned enforcement might be inconsistent. Users are able to
export their posts if they wish to leave the platform.

“We’ve
given serious thought to who we want to be to our community moving
forward,” Mr D’Onofrio said. “We’ve realised that in order to continue
to fulfil our promise and place in culture, especially as it evolves, we
must change.”

That change means marginalised people, those who
are all-too-used to being ostracised in their offline lives, now face it
in their online space too. Some of the internet’s most-needed
communities are now homeless.

"We’ve given serious thought to who we want to be to our community moving forward,” Mr D’Onofrio said.

Well, that rather says it all, doesn’t it?

Tumblr’s porn ban abandons the marginalised

hugobugo:

feministpixie:

“Oh, so because I’m straight I’m not allowed to have an opinion on [insert LGBT issue here]”

Listen. 

I’m an english major. I know next to nothing about science, engineering, and astronomy. Sure, I think space is cool. I’m very supportive of NASA’s efforts. I might even have an opinion on where we should send the next shuttle or how much money we should spend on space travel. 

But at the end of the day, my opinion on the matter is not valuable. I’m not going to enter into a discussion about the next shuttle launch with a bunch of trained scientists and expect them to take me seriously. 

Sometimes, your opinion is not valuable. Sometimes, you aren’t qualified to enter a discussion.

And, lets be honest, straight people’s opinions are valued in literally every other situation. Hell, straight people get more awards for lgbt “activism” than queer people themselves.

If you really can’t accept that sometimes your voice isn’t the most important in the room, you might need to get over yourself. 

IMPORTANT

elodieunderglass:

sonicscrewdriverofsarcasm:

As someone who does ceramics, that twisted, broken up fork would make an excellent tool for slipping and scoring, or maybe even just texturing. It would make a super cute bug print, or make easy, perfectly spaced lines at a farther difference than a typical fork. It can be used for creating, rather than just feeding some giant machine. Just because it wouldn’t be particularly good at being used as it is expected to be used, which is not to say that a creative person couldn’t find a way to make it work, does not make it useless. In the right hands, even the most seemingly “useless” object can be functional, or even groundbreaking in the right hands.

Also, people aren’t objects, and you dont need to be able to “use” them in order for them to exist.

Although the third item may not be useful as a fork, it may not be a fork at all. It might be a spongulator or breckinaid or wizmark. I don’t know,

it’s none of my business, I’m not a toolologist or a breckinmonger; I am only am amateur curator of mysterious artifacts. I 

(Whatever that particular strange item is, I’m sure that some archaeologist has one of its siblings in a drawer somewhere, labeled as a “ritual object.” We’ve probably been making them since the Bronze Age. Scholars probably throw up their hands helplessly when another one of these comes up; they debate their origins, label them as a fragment of a lost conversation with unknown gods.)

But the picture presents a series of items, presented as if they already have a relationship with each other, in which one of the items has failed. And, like, I’m not pretending to be an Art Critique here, but I feel like we got over that in the early 1900s with the Surrealists, yeah?

That’s the literal entire plot of The Ugly Duckling (1843).

Just because something’s been plonked down in context with some other things that it vaguely resembles doesn’t mean that it’s somehow Bad, because it fails to Resemble the Other Things, especially if it’s a pile of things that somebody arranged. The person who arranged the photograph deliberately arranged a context to make it seem as if the item had failed at being a fork. But if they had taken the same non-matching item and lit it artistically, then that same artist would be demanding accolades for their Very Original Picture of a Breckinaid.

Figure 2. Breckinaids are frequently exploited by artists and upcyclers, due to their abundance and versatility. They are commonly thought to be more useful, beautiful and valuable than forks, although, of course, that is not everything. 

However, all that being said: as OP says, people aren’t forks or breckinaids (or even wizmarks). And we are not measured by our ability to fork or breck. 

Although, obviously, we are all obligated to give a fork about each other. 

Import from Tumblr

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started